β οΈ
CONTESTED ESTIMATE
Significant methodological disputes. View caveats below.
πIndustry
Reindustrialisation Package
Upfront
+Β£8.0bn
Annual
+Β£4.0bn
Revenue
+Β£9.0bn
Net Annual Effect
+Β£13.0bn/year
Payback in 8 years
GDP +2%Productivity +0.35%very high uncertainty
UNCERTAINTY RANGE (Annual Net Effect)
Most Pessimistic
-Β£15.0bn
β·
Most Optimistic
+Β£30.0bn
β οΈ
MAJOR CAVEATS
- β’UK deindustrialisation was policy choice (energy costs, planning, skills) not inevitable market outcome
- β’Services focus has delivered stagnant productivity since 2008 - "comparative advantage" is circular argument
- β’"Picking winners" critique applies to all state action; question is whether current approach works (it doesnt)
- β’US IRA/EU subsidies are real competitors but UK can focus on niches, not match scale
- β’Energy costs 40-60% above EU is solvable policy problem, not fixed constraint
- β’Labour costs argument ignores productivity: Germany has higher wages AND more manufacturing
- β’Brexit friction real but UK can also negotiate FTAs with faster-growing markets
- β’Taiwan/Korea/Singapore success required state capacity UK currently lacks - rebuild that first
3 sources